Search for: "Cotton v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
Tom Cotton also “won’t endorse a strategy to indefinitely block any Supreme Court nominee from Hillary Clinton. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
-Beaumont 1917, writ ref'd) (quoting Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure) (emphasis added); United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Any arbitration shall be conducted in Harris County, Texas, United States of America in the English language. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Leach Builders, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
Seventh Circuit: Bold strategy, Cotton. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
The Gutierrez family continues with the tradition introducing La Michoacana to the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
After all, we have one commander in chief at a time, and the United States is weakened if our presidency is weakened. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for example, has focused on ESG by investigating and taking action against companies that tout business practices such as consideration of environmental sustainability, but fail, in practice, to live up to their claims. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
Law creates idea that the market is separate from the state. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am
When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
Warwick Rothnie considers Elwood v Cotton On and asks is copying enough to infringe Down Under?. [read post]
