Search for: "Cotton v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
Circuit in the Uighur litigation held that a right to release is not the same thing as a right to release into the United States. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:02 am
” Anderson v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:29 pm
At this time of year, when the American Law Institute, "the leading independent organization in the United States producing scholarly work to clarify, modernize, and otherwise improve the law" (ALI About), holds its annual meeting in Washington D.C., to note the publication of a very interesting set of articles in a symposium, a "Restatement of. . . [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Sundquist, 13-852, a case involving the power of a state to restrict an out-of-state national bank’s exercise of its fiduciary powers in that state. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am
The SUM prospectus’ third paragraph consists of the following sentence: “The dearness of labour and the want of Capital are the two great objections to the success of manufactures in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am
” In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus similarly decries the ruling, contending that, although the United States is “a predominantly Christian nation,” “we live here, too — we are Americans, too — and the Constitution, which prohibits elevating one religion over another, demands some sensitivity to this fact. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:11 am
United States. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
United States, 13-632. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
United States, 13-7120 (ditto); Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:40 am
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
United States, 13-7120. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
United States 13-744Issue: Whether a medical professional can be convicted of “knowingly and willfully” making a false statement in medical records or reports under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
On Monday, March 31, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held oral arguments in the much-anticipated software battle between patentee Alice Corporation, the petitioner, and CLS Bank, the respondent who was victorious below thanks to an equally divided Federal Circuit. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
United States, 13-632. [read post]
