Search for: "Cotton v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 2:41 pm
And when the Supreme Court granted review in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
Kerry 13-628Issue: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in "Israel" on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute "impermissibly infringes on the President's exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him." [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Cotton, 13-551, involving a qualified immunity claim arising from a police officer’s error entering a license plate number, and Martinez v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
CVSG United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:40 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America 13-449Issue: (1) Whether the First Amendment permits civil courts to retroactively impose a “trust” on church property based on church canons that were never embodied in any secular instrument of property ownership and did not comply with state law at the time of their adoption; (2) whether the Contracts Clause permits civil courts resolving church property disputes to apply changes to… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
The Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, 13-449, a high-visibility dispute between the national Episcopal Church and a portion of a former congregation over who gets to open a Quizno’s in an especially prime location. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
United States 13-392Issue: (1) Whether, in the context of a First-Amendment-protected contribution to a judicial campaign, the McCormick v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
United States 13-457Issue: Whether the Secretary of State’s issuance of a passport based on a determination of a person’s United States citizenship is conclusive proof of the passport holder’s citizenship such that it may not be collaterally attacked. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
In Cotton v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
Animal lovers will be relieved to hear that, despite Ron and Doby engaging in a little wrestling, the American Humane Association (AHA) stated in the film’s credits that:“No Animals Were Harmed In The Making Of This FilmTM”This post examines whether trade mark rights can be claimed in slogans and considers the AHA's prospects of success in registering this one in the United Kingdom or elsewhere in the European Union.Can trade mark rights be claimed in a… [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:41 am
” United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
Procedural HistoryThis suit was filed by The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”) against Alps South, LLC (“Alps”) for in- fringement of United States Patent No. 5,830,237 (the “’237 patent”). [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
