Search for: "Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. King" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As there is no evidence suggesting that Grover & Fensterstock was aware of or part of Lauria’s fraudulent scheme, none of the exceptions to the privity requirement are applicable here (see Mauro v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 116 AD3d 930, 933 [2d Dept 2014]; Chemical Bank v Bowers, 228 AD2d 407, 408 [2d Dept 1996]; see also Hinnant v Carrington Mtge. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by Wolfgang Demino
On April 24, 2017, Law Firm filed two complaints on behalf of NCSLT 2006-3 against Douglass in King County Superior Court. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Subscription Required SUFFOLK COUNTYReal Property Countrywide Fails to Comply With Newly Enacted Provisions of Home Equity Theft Prevention Act Countrywide Home Loans Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., the Court held that the Truth in Lending Act only requires a borrower exercising his right to rescind to provide written notice of the intent to rescind within three years; it does not require him to file suit within three years. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:35 am
Aftar NASSAU COUNTYReal PropertyUnsupported Allegation of Fraud in Executing Mortgage Grants Judgment in Foreclosure Action Countrywide Home Loans Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:21 am
Countrywide Home Loans Inc.NEW YORK COUNTYBusiness LawEqual Shareholder May Not Maintain Action In Corporation's Name Absent Derivative SuitBinky Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
“It has long been the rule in Missouri that on cross-examination, a witness may be asked any questions which tend to test his accuracy, veracity or credibility…” Sandy Ford Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by Mandelman
  They’re not a private company… and the bankers they’re always blowing shouldn’t even be open for business because they’re completely insolvent and continue to remain alive only because they are on a combination of taxpayer funded life support, debt guarantees, and suspended accounting rule nonsense sanctioned by the king of transparency himself… the man who, more than any other I can think of, should be in a cell… Treasury Secretary Tim… [read post]