Search for: "County Council v. Billings, et al."
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 2:07 pm
Haaland, et al. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:54 pm
In the belatedly-published Environmental Council of Sacramento, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
Smith, et al. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
(Water Rights; Federal Trust Duties) Pollard, et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
Mazzetti, et al. [read post]
5 May 2019, 2:34 pm
Complete Lawn Care, Inc., et al, may or may not be good law, ( .. however the court’s analysis of preemption is not consistent with this same appellate court’s decision last November in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, et al. v. [read post]
Ind. Decisions - Yet more on: Impact of Fort Wayne Disability Center ruling in other areas of state?
5 Aug 2007, 3:54 pm
The question, he said, would be whether a particular agreement could accurately be described as covering only such services.There is no mention in the story of the July 16th Indiana COA decision in Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:53 am
Manuel Farescal, M.D., et al. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
That issue can arise, as it does in the new case of Armour, et al., v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
THE CITY OF PALO ALTO et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
The Bill of Rights Today: Constitutional Limits on the Powers of Government. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Docket: 08-327 Title: Arizona, et al. v. [read post]
