Search for: "County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162: The processing of sequential boundary line adjustments is categorically exempt from CEQA, as long as a discretionary permit is not concurrently processed. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 6:47 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(A131254; 203 Cal.App.4th 656; Alameda County Superior Court; RG10517314.) [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Inyo County Board of Supervisors (Dec. 14, 2009, No. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(A139222; 230 Cal.App.4th 85; Marin County Superior Court; CV1103591, CV1103605.) [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Ken White
County of Los Angeles, in which a firefighter challenged a sexual harassment policy that forbade firefighters from having pornography at work. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]