Search for: "County of Los Angeles v. Civil Service Commission of the County of Los Angeles"
Results 61 - 80
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 4:24 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and Janus v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Living Rivers Council v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
City of Los Angeles (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1180, 1197-1198.) [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:14 am
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
We granted review to determine whether the definition of neglect under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
County of Los Angeles, S226749. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 10:15 am
Reforming a Broken Criminal Justice System We closed or reformed scandalously dangerous prisons and jails in Arizona; Baltimore, Maryland; and Los Angeles and Monterey County, California. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 7:12 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Watson) (1975) 13 Cal. 3d 652, 658; see also San Diego Unified Port District v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
