Search for: "County of Los Angeles v. State of California (1987)"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
Such programs and thresholds will likely dovetail with state and local efforts to meet GHG reduction targets set by the state or in local climate action plans. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
Libby, a deputy federal public defender in Los Angeles. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
State of California , 2022 Cal. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:04 am
Los Angeles Dodgers , 2024 Cal. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:05 pm
Los Angeles County Harbor/UCLA Med. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In Lockyer v City & County of San Francisco, the California Supreme Court explained that the regulation of marriage in California is committed to state officials, so that the mayor of San Francisco had no authority to “take any action with regard to the process of issuing marriage licenses or registering marriage certificates. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 314-315 (1987).) [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 314-315 (1987).) [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:38 pm
On September 25, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint in the Superior Court of California for Los Angeles County. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Over half an hour after the execution began, a doctor wearing a blue hood to cover his face entered the execution chamber to check Angel Diaz's vital signs. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
" California Appellate Districts, January 24, 2008 "County of L.A. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm
Wells appeared on CNN today, and Wolf Blitzer challenged him to take a lie detector test: Blitzer challenged Wells to a polygraph test, and he agreed to take one if his former employers at the Los Angeles County, California, District Attorney's office allow it. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
California State Lands Commission)? [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:19 pm
City of Sacramento, 10 Cal. 4th 368, 376-77 (1995); City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 272 — for the first time at oral argument; the quoted language explained that requiring EIRs for ministerial actions would be a wasteful gesture where the agency did not possess enough discretion to deny or modify the project based on environmental concerns raised by the EIR. [read post]
