Search for: "County of Marin v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 235
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative LawSource: Justia November 25, 2011 Buffalo Marine Services Inc., et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am
APPA’s 2,000 state and community-owned utilities own approximately 200 coal-fired units with an aggregate generating capacity of 31 GW. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
A California District Court upheld a school’s decision to prevent students wearing the flag on their T shirts on Cinco de Mayo (a day of Mexican celebration across the United States when the Mexican flag is often worn). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am
The federal government filed the new appeal (United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
TheRepulic reports on United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
http://j.st/pQV United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:42 pm
This decision may not yet be released for publication.Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
We provide free legal consultations for bankruptcy in San Francisco County, Sacramento County, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Stanislaus County, San Joaquin County, Marin County, Solano County and throughout Northern California. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
SAYS, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Rogelio Casados and Rafaela Casados, No. 10-0523 In re United Scaffolding, Inc., No. 10-0526 Rusk State Hospital v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
One purpose of this dinner was to discuss Kimberly's interest in how one became a United States magistrate judge. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
North County Times is reporting the indefinite delay of United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:16 pm
Bank, which is a unit of U.S. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:53 am
Under this Directive, `[a]ctions that are taken for the primary purpose of furthering a military . . . function of the United States, regardless of incidental benefits to civilian authorities[ ]’ do not violate the PCA. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:29 pm
The revised designation includes approximately 2,053 acres in Dare and Hyde Counties, North Carolina and consists of four habitat units... [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
