Search for: "County of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento"
Results 101 - 120
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
Now it has, holding:Accordingly, it is no longer possible in light of Lingle and [County of Sacramento v.] [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
County of Los Angeles, supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at pp. 420-421; City of El Monte v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
Riverside County Flood Control District (1988) 47 Cal.3d 550.) [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:53 am
The court found this to constitute, without a doubt, a public nuisance: If the unlawful filling up of the channel of a river. . .and burying with sand and gravel, and utterly destroying all the farms of the riparian owners on either side, over a space two miles wide and twelve miles long, along its entire course through the Sacramento valley, and across nearly an entire country; if the sand and gravel so sent down is, also, only restrained from working similar destruction to a large extent… [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:28 am
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656, concluding that parking impacts fell within the scope of CEQA. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:32 am
Sacramento City Sch Dist v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 11:11 am
Sacramento City Sch Dist v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
(City of Dinuba v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:55 pm
To add another layer to this, counties and cities also enact laws particular to their own communities. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 9:18 am
City of Tulare (case no. 08-228122, Tulare County Sup. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Sacramento City Sch Dist v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:41 am
County of Sacramento (9th Cir. 2004) 368 F.3d 1082. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
The case is Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
A number of California transit agencies, as well as cities and counties that operate and maintain transit systems, are in legal limbo over whether the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (“PEPRA”) applies to mass transit employees. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:55 am
Martin on behalf of the California State Association of Counties and 33 cities and counties. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 413, 418; Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
County of Sacramento (3rd Dist. 2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 671 Without first completing an EIR, the County of Sacramento denied Sunset Skyranch Airport’s (“Airport”) request for a renewal of its Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”). [read post]
