Search for: "County of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento"
Results 121 - 140
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm
Sacramento City Sch Dist v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
By Phillip Tate and Michael Kiely Two cases filed in Sacramento County, City of Cerritos v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
(Baa2) as gas supplier guarantor; (ii) Royal Bank of Canada (Aa3) as commodity swap provider; (iii) the City of Colorado Springs (Aa2) as participant; (iv) Transamerica Life Insurance Company (A1/ P-1) as guaranteed investment agreement provider; and (v) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (A2) as guaranteed investment agreement provider. (19) Natural Gas Acquisition Corporation of the City of Clarksville, TN Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2006 Moody’s has… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
(Baa2) as gas supplier guarantor; (ii) Royal Bank of Canada (Aa3) as commodity swap provider; (iii) the City of Colorado Springs (Aa2) as participant; (iv) Transamerica Life Insurance Company (A1/ P-1) as guaranteed investment agreement provider; and (v) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (A2) as guaranteed investment agreement provider. (19) Natural Gas Acquisition Corporation of the City of Clarksville, TN Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2006 Moody’s has… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:49 am
(Baa2) as gas supplier guarantor; (ii) Royal Bank of Canada (Aa3) as commodity swap provider; (iii) the City of Colorado Springs (Aa2) as participant; (iv) Transamerica Life Insurance Company (A1/ P-1) as guaranteed investment agreement provider; and (v) Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank (A2) as guaranteed investment agreement provider. (19) Natural Gas Acquisition Corporation of the City of Clarksville, TN Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2006 Moody’s has… [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:04 pm
In City of Palmdale, et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:00 am
In Deanza Assoc. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Eminent Domain in Placer County: According to an article in the Sacramento Bee, Eminent domain process OK'd for road widening in Placer County, Placer County Supervisors authorized the use of eminent domain to acquire pieces of five properties needed to complete the widening of Auburn Folsom Road. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
(City of Dinuba v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
County of Los Angeles, supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at pp. 420-421; City of El Monte v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:05 am
The parents then sued the California Department of Transportation, the city of Sacramento, the county of Sacramento, Standard Parking Corporation and Sea View Restaurants, operating as Harry’s Fish, for negligence. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
(See County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Priest (1976) 18 Cal.3d 728, 737-738 (Serrano II); see County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
County of Sacramento (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 1270, 1280-1281 [holding use of CEQA baseline incorporating 30 years of unauthorized and illegal development was within County’s discretion]; Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. [read post]
