Search for: "County of San Diego v. Commission on State Mandates" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 The City of San Diego amended its zoning code to permit cannabis enterprises as a use within a number of zoning districts in the City. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While federal law mandates a certain level of voter roll maintenance, states differ on how they manage their registration databases. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:40 pm
  Time will tell.Meanwhile, today's opinion is a pretty clear win for the counties -- and a loss for the state -- which will get more money to help pay for SVP proceedings. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, holding that state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction for liability actions under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, the high court held that CEQA applied to a state public entity’s railroad project on a State-owned rail line as an act of “self-governance,” and was not a preempted “regulation” (i.e., not an “environmental preclearance requirement”) under the Federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995. [read post]