Search for: "County of San Diego v. Commission on State Mandates"
Results 61 - 72
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco… [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
s mandates. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
County of San Diego (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 1428, 1452-1453 [CEQA baseline included illegal development at mining operation seeking use permit]; Fat v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of San Diego, Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
San Diego Navy Broadway Complex Coalition v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
Superior Court of San Diego County (Hohnbaum). [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
Finally, in an effort to strengthen states’ abilities to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing of plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, MIPPA requires plans to: use only agents and brokers licensed under state law; abide by state appointment laws; report any agent terminations to the state; and comply with state requests for information regarding the performance of agents, brokers, and… [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:00 pm
Kiewit Pacific Corporation (9th Cir. 2007) ___ F.3d ___ (June 20, 2007, Case No. 0457134), a group of construction workers filed suit in San Diego County Superior Court, alleging that Kiewit never compensated them for time they spent traveling from designated meeting sites to their jobsites and from those jobsites back to the designated meeting sites; Kiewit required them to undertake this round trip daily; and they were not allowed to get to the jobsites on their own. [read post]
