Search for: "County of Santa Cruz v. U.s"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
County of Santa Cruz (2008) 170 Cal.App.4th 229, a developer asserted that a temporary regulatory taking occurred when the County of Santa Cruz (“County”) improperly and unlawfully delayed granting a ministerial permit for electricity. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm
Or the litigant could live in Santa Cruz, a city located outside of Santa Clara County but in California. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:10 am
Santa Cruz-Monterey-Merced Managed Medical Care Commission, 2014 U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:40 pm
County of Santa Cruz, No. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:54 am
(The Supreme Court agrees to some extent: see U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 1:02 pm
Since the right of California cannabis delivery services was cemented late last year with the state supreme court’s ruling in County of Santa Cruz v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 (9th Cir. 1987). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania overruled the 34-year-old ripeness rule articulated in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania overruled the 34-year-old ripeness rule articulated in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
City of Santa Cruz, 818 F.2d 1449 (9th Cir. 1988). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 2:34 pm
County of Santa Cruz (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1038, that the county could take into account the results of a resident survey in deciding whether to grant or deny the application. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:13 am
Bank of America eventually commenced a foreclosure proceeding against the home securing the mortgages, and thereby caused the Santa Cruz County Recorder's Office to publish defamatory statements concerning Plaintiff in the foreclosure documents. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
For the County of San Mateo, the County of Marin, the City of Imperial Beach, the City and County of Santa Cruz, and the City of Richmond, the district court found that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
For the County of San Mateo, the County of Marin, the City of Imperial Beach, the City and County of Santa Cruz, and the City of Richmond, the district court found that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
City of Santa Cruz (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 694. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:11 am
The U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
Trial Court Proceedings The Santa Cruz County District Attorney filed an information charging Black with three counts of theft by false pretenses and three counts of making false statements in the offer or sale of a security. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
Trial Court Proceedings The Santa Cruz County District Attorney filed an information charging Black with three counts of theft by false pretenses and three counts of making false statements in the offer or sale of a security. [read post]
