Search for: "County of Will v. Pollution Control Board" Results 81 - 100 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
District Court for the Central District of California, Lifoam Industries is required to pay a $450,000 penalty and must vent all of its manufacturing emissions through an air pollution control device. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm by Pace Law School Library
Board of County Commissioners of Wabaunsee County, 218 P.3d 400, 2009.) 18 Mo. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm by Steven M. Taber
Landfill gas collected by the separate Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA) and Edgeboro Disposal Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
“Maricopa County’s particulate air pollution is a serious problem,” said Deborah Jordan, director of the Air Division in the EPA’s Pacific Southwest office. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
Fairfax County School Board, implicates that concern. [read post]
The County issued an erosion-control permit to allow the establishment of a vineyard on land currently used for grazing. [read post]
The County issued an erosion-control permit to allow the establishment of a vineyard on land currently used for grazing. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
These new lawsuits join several actions launched against private fossil fuel companies for climate impacts in recent years: Luciano v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am by Evangelina Cantu
They rely on the equal sovereignty principle, which the Supreme Court applied in Shelby County v. [read post]