Search for: "Cover v. ID Board of Correction"
Results 1 - 20
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
That argument isn’t at issue in the case: Everyone agrees that if Donald Trump was subject to Section 3 as President, and if he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021, then that conduct rendered him legally ineligible to serve as President or in the other covered state and federal offices (absent action by two-thirds of both houses of Congress to eliminate that disability). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
II, § 1, cl. 8; and the Executive Vesting Clause, id. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
October 20, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we end the third quarter and enter the fall season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm
Id. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477, 496–97 (2010) (quoting Clinton v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
” Id. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Chapter 440 does not cover an accident resulting in injury, which does not arise out of, but does occur in the course and scope of employment. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
” Id., at ___ (slip op., at 17) (quoting FDA v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The European Data Protection Board have created a dedicated task force on ChatGPT. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Start w/question of strict liability v. blanket immunity; look at possible regimes; map out core elements of 512, DSA, and 230. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Id. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Id. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
” The proposal, which takes up more than 500 pages, defines “Covered Entities” and has four core requirements: “Covered Entity. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
