Search for: "Cover v. ID Board of Correction"
Results 41 - 60
of 167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/10/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA1841
Rabbitt -- Makes sex offenders 13 or older, juvenile delinquents, juvenile offenders, youthful offenders, subject to the sex offender registrySUMM : Amd SS168-a, 168-c, 168-e & 168-f, Cor L; amd S720.35, CP L; amd S380.1, Fam Ct Act Makes sex offenders 13 years of age or older, juvenile delinquents, juvenile offenders, youthful offenders, subject to the sex offender registry. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
” Id. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:57 pm
The saga continues in Arizona v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
Even the USPTO now regrets having originally issued Apple's D'677 patent, which covers little more than a round button. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
” Id., at ___ (slip op., at 17) (quoting FDA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 1:04 pm
” In PPC Broadband, Inc v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
(Morales v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
Id. at *7. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
He was then transferred from the Nassau County Correctional Center to the Suffolk County Correctional Facility in Riverhead (hereinafter the Riverhead facility), which is operated by the Sheriff of Suffolk County, for completion of proceedings on the Suffolk County criminal charge. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
That argument isn’t at issue in the case: Everyone agrees that if Donald Trump was subject to Section 3 as President, and if he engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021, then that conduct rendered him legally ineligible to serve as President or in the other covered state and federal offices (absent action by two-thirds of both houses of Congress to eliminate that disability). [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Id. at 1384. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
Id. at 565 citing Fair Price, supra , 42 AD3d at 285. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Id. at *3.However the docs got their hands on this unapproved stent, it was supposed to be used in accordance with procedures overseen by the defendant's hospital's institutional review board ("IRB"). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:12 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
’ Id. quoting State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
Id. at 713. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:49 am
" [18] V. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Id. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
