Search for: "Covington v. Davis" Results 41 - 55 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am by Richard D. Friedman
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
”  While Crawford and Davis were decided unanimously, Giles v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:20 am
Today’s Legal Times updates readers on developments in Young v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:05 am
Lafler    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0300n.06 Davis v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:05 am
Lafler    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0300n.06 Davis v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Bankruptcy Court - Covington 08a0199n.062008/04/16 Burnett v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Box 14115 Baton Rouge, LA 70898 Phone: (225) 925-9500; (800) 270-6185 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: cpourciau@latan.org Web: http://www.latan.org LATAN Northwest P.O. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Jeff Davis County Includes the city of Hazlehurst. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
I: Introduction During the uncertain times of World War II, Harvard University's president was interviewed concerning the condition of the law school. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]