Search for: "Cox's Case" Results 1 - 20 of 3,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
Irrelevant of arguments about safe harbor protection at the heart of the case, Cox might not been responsible for users' infringement as companies are only liable for contributing to infringement if the companies either know about acts of infringement, or are wilfully blind to them, and the appellate court ruled that the trial judge, District Judge Liam O'Grady, had incorrectly told the jurors that they could find Cox liable if it knew or should have known about… [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 5:02 pm by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Discovery failure — Attorney’s fees In this case, the Circuit Court for Talbot County granted appellee Mark Wester’s motion to compel discovery, and entered judgment in the amount of $980.50 in favor of his attorneys, appellees Daniel Cox and the Cox Law Center, LLC (“Cox”), and against Jessica Wester’s attorneys, appellants Richard ... [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am by Annemarie Bridy
Importantly for future cases involving section 512(i)’s repeat infringer requirement, the Fourth Circuit in this case had nothing negative to say about the liberality of Cox’s thirteen-strike policy. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:45 am by Law Offices of Scott David Stewart
Arquette allegedly has stated that he has and Cox made the wise decision during their marriage to prepare a marital contract in case they were ever to divorce. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
Cox Communications did not infringe patents owned by Verizon Communications, a jury in Virginia decided. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am by Camilla Hrdy
So in Cox's framework, if the plaintiff had won (which it didn't in that case) then it would have been due to use of "lies. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:00 am by Ben
 http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/with-a-week-to-go-before-rightscorp-trial-cox-loses-key-dmca-motion/ and  http://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-rules-against-cox-communications-in-copyright-case-1448404833 [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 3:40 am by Ben
 “Although Rightscorp was not a party in this case, we are delighted with the outcome. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Cox Knew About Pirating Subscribers, Court Concludes Yesterday First off today, Ernesto at Torrentfreak writes that a judge has ruled that Cox was aware of the piracy taking place on its service, even if he did not rule (at this time) that Cox is liable for it. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:56 am by marcorandazza
He wrote about the Crystal Cox extortion case back in December, and I missed the story. [...] [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 9:03 am
A brief heads-up: over on the Election Law Blog, Adam Cox has posted a piece on the NAMUDNO argument (you can get some background on the case on the SCOTUS Wiki). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by Benjamin Wittes
Over at the Document Exploitation blog, Douglas Cox of the CUNY Law School has this very interesting post on redactions in the Alsabri Guantanamo habeas case–which was decided at the District Court level about a year ago and is now pending at the D.C. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:26 pm
Ogden is the first book-length treatment of a landmark Supreme Court case from 1824. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court evaluates a range of cases, including Grokster, and several 9th Circuit cases. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm by lennyesq
The case is believed to be among the first to seek court approval since Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 5:30 am
Chairman Cox gave the speech on Wednesday, March 14. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:47 am
Interestingly, however, the divorce paperwork filed in the Cox-Arquette case makes no mention of a premarital agreement. [read post]