Search for: "Cox v. Cook" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Jonathan Bailey
A similar case, against Cox Communications, saw the jury award the record labels 1 billion dollars. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
Having been basked, the goose is then cooked. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
Joe Klein, Senator Government V. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
Treatment could be cooking, high hydrostatic pressure, irradiation, or other validated processes. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Cook County Includes the cities of Adel, Cecil, Lenox, and Sparks. [read post]