Search for: "Cox v. Long"
Results 1 - 20
of 431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am
"But, and its a big but, the 4th Circuit took a long hard look at how and why Cox would be protected by US "safe harbor" provisions that protect service providers from liability when users infringe copyright. - and here the Court ruled against Cox on a key point. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in MGM v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
" (Cox, 30-31) (quoting Advanta USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 1:09 pm
Last week’s BMG v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Some of our readers have been following Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:40 am
Cox & Thomas J. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 7:35 pm
Cox v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:54 am
Cox, Randall T. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 10:15 pm
blank">Cox v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:20 pm
(quoting Callahan v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:20 pm
(quoting Callahan v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 2:18 pm
A nice present as we head into the long weekend. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
The court in Cox v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:05 am
The opinion is styled, Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 2:53 am
In the context of an election year, a collision was inevitable – and the consequences may be long-lasting for freedom of speech everywhere. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:33 am
Kim v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Many of those signing on were on the professors' brief filed in Matrixx v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
United States, No. 16-691, Cox v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
It will hear that it is the role of the appellate court to either affirm the first-instance decision or substitute a new meaning: what it cannot do is weakly conclude it should not interfere so long as the decision reached was “open to” the first instance judge. [read post]
