Search for: "Cox v. Miller"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
As well as a number of important Supreme Court decisions in the interim, there have been a number of developments, including a large award of damages, in the Obsidian Finance v Cox litigation. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:52 am
” People v Cox, 286 N.Y. 137, 142 (1941). [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Cox. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Stephanie Miller, a human resources representative at Best Buy, led the investigation. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
Miller, a 1939 case,” she said. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Ch 7 dbtr lacks standing to challenge case admin. bec it lacks pecuniary int. in outcome, incl 363 sales. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Miller-D-MD-Titus-8-24-11.pdf … D-NC: Gen. unsec. cr. has standing to assert eq. subord. claim by showing a particul. injury different from other crs. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/BlackPalmDevp-WDNC-Reidinger-10-13-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Dgs. for Chrysler's breach of tax exemption agr.… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
Cox, ___ F. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:51 pm
Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Cox 14-531Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Martinez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm
Stephanie Miller, a human resources representative at Best Buy, led the investigation. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Cox Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitBOYCE F. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:49 pm
” In Miller v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 4:32 am
Cox v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:26 am
In a partial victory of sorts for the employer, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion for class certification, finding his circumstances too unique to satisfy Rule 23 commonality and adequacy requirements (Cox v. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
Cox, 124 F.2d 650 (4th Cir. 1942)). [read post]
