Search for: "Cox v. Peters"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
The standard set by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Crits v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
ARLA Propertymark chief executive David Cox said: Licensing schemes do not work, and never will. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
That claim was brought by Peter A. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 9:48 am
It's Case T-437/09 Oyster Cosmetics SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Kadabell GmbH & Co. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:15 am
First up is Borrero v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm
Levy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
The former SEC Commissioners are Aulana Peters, Paul Atkins, Joseph Grundfest, Philip Lochner, Charles Cox and Stephen Friedman. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
Cox & Cristina M. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
The acquittal has been seen as a blow to the Crown Prosecution Service, which has been accused by defence counsel (and Tory MP) Geoffrey Cox QC of bringing “lunatic” charges against reporters. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:22 pm
Peter B. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, (IMPACT), USPTO launches First Action Interview Pilot Program: (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Baristas), (Patently-O), (Patent Docs), (IP Spotlight), (Anticipate This!) [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:01 am
In July 2008, writing as “Peter Kaufman, Ph.D. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
Cox: Use-based definitions make sense. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
A letter from shareholders to the Honorable Christopher Cox, requesting a return to the pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, stressed an important distinction: ". . . between using a shareholder resolution as a back-door device to contest a specific election and using a shareholder resolution in order to change the rules for election so as to further the long-term interests of shareholders. [read post]
