Search for: "Cox v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Nursing Home Resident Deaths Increasingly Caused by Bedrails Nursing Home Visits Key to the Mental Health of Residents  Illinois Supreme Court Decides Arbitration Rights in Nursing Home Death Case; Carter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 7:27 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in TransCare v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by TJ McIntyre
  The 2001 Act only allowed for penalty of IR£500 or 6 months for failure to disclose passwords and as far as we are aware these penalties were never imposed.The Superior Courts in Ireland have on occasion in recent years issued Anton Pillar Orders and other civil warrants which required individuals to disclose passwords to representatives of Civil plaintiffs, under threat of being held in contempt and summarily jailed. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Brad Kuhn
The Superior Coatings Decision Last week, the California Court of Appeal, Division 3, issued an opinion in Superior Coatings v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:12 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Bradshaw, 14 Cal. 4th 557, 577 (1996).Today, the Superior Court issued an order to show cause to CDCR to proceed or show cause why it cannot.In other action, the LA DA has also moved to intervene in the federal lawsuit of Morales v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:35 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Craig Cox of the Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas granted the Motion to Consolidate. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]