Search for: "Craighead v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2022, 5:41 am
Exch. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 7:30 am
Both Mike at C&F and Eugene at VC have posted about Judge Bybee's 9th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:39 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Craighead v Homes for Islington & LB Islington [2010] UKUT 47 (LC) is a decision of Andrew Trott in the Upper Tribunal on an appeal from the LVT. 21 leaseholders faced bills of £30-40,000 for service charges between 2006 and 2008 relating to "external repairs & decoration, window/roof renewal". [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Craighead v Homes for Islington & LB Islington [2010] UKUT 47 (LC) is a decision of Andrew Trott in the Upper Tribunal on an appeal from the LVT. 21 leaseholders faced bills of £30-40,000 for service charges between 2006 and 2008 relating to "external repairs & decoration, window/roof renewal". [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:20 am
” (See Snyder v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
They stated (in Fraser (Nat Gordon) v HM Advocate (No. 2) [2009] HCJAC 27 at paragraph 13 that: “[W]e have come to the conclusion that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council should be refused as incompetent. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:50 am
Craighead, No. 07-10135 (8-21-08). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
Decision The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lord Hope of Craighead giving the leading judgment. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
As you may recall, in its complaint for copyright infringement, HarperCollins argued that its contract for Julie of the Wolves, a book first published in 1972, gave it the sole right to publish Jean Craighead George’s YA classic in eBook form. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
As you may recall, in its complaint for copyright infringement, HarperCollins argued that its contract for Julie of the Wolves, a book first published in 1972, gave it the sole right to publish Jean Craighead George’s YA classic in eBook form. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
As you may recall, in its complaint for copyright infringement, HarperCollins argued that its contract for Julie of the Wolves, a book first published in 1972, gave it the sole right to publish Jean Craighead George’s YA classic in eBook form. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
Airways v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am
R(on the application of S and KF) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 1810 (Admin)- read judgment This case about prisoner’s pay provides an interesting up to date analysis of the role of the doctrine of “margin of appreciation” and its applicability in domestic courts. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
