Search for: "Crawford et al" Results 101 - 120 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2011, 7:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Armen’s classic paper with Harold Demsetz (AER, 1972) remains influential in the theory of the firm literature and is listed as the 12th most important paper in economics since 1970 by Kim et al. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm by Barbara Moreno
Lee Epstein, et al, The Supreme Court Compendium:  Two Centuries of Data, Decisions, and Developments (2021). 13. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:58 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
Top stories today via @ozaz @delimiterau @charispalmer @mumbrellajobs @emma_rodgers it makes sense really: "Google bets on Africa as the next Internet hotspot" http://smf.is/1uInye a good piece by @LeslieCannold: "Time for a reality check" http://smf.is/1uIny4 this is a little strange and concerning: "The FBI Had No Warrant for the Raid on Instapaper, Pinboard, et al. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 6:16 am
Original reporting always wins my heart over, and Denniston is still a marvel of energy and smarts after a half a century on the Supreme Court beat.Jan Crawford Greenburg's Legalities: For those of us enjoying a severe TV deficit in our diets, this blog tells what TV's most committed legal reporter is up to. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 5:06 pm
”   Feminist Jurisprudence: Taking Women Seriously 717 (Mary Becker et al. eds., 2001). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Magley, et al (NFP) - "Appellant/Defendant Cadleway Properties, Inc. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Beer, et al., v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
The second category involves reparable or recoverable ‘damage’, such as shoreline damage from storms (CDKN et al., 2012; Morrissey & Oliver-Smith, 2013; Nishat, et al., 2013). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
 El texto es largo (son más de 70 páginas) y puede ser algo farragoso o técnico sobre todo al principio. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de Havilland… [read post]