Search for: "Credit Acceptance Corp. v Garcia" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Each written credit service agreement contained a provision entitled "Waiver of Jury Trial and Arbitration Provision" (hereinafter referred to as "arbitration provision"). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Sections 9.24 (b) and 9.25 pertained to procedures for using sick-leave credits to defray premium costs. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Sections 9.24 (b) and 9.25 pertained to procedures for using sick-leave credits to defray premium costs. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
JUANITA PEREZ, VIRGINIA GARCIA, PAUL ZAPATA, AND SYLVIA SANCHEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ALL HEIRS OF ELISA ZAPATA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00111-CV,406 SW3d 313, 06-26-13) 13-0576 THE WILLIAMSBURG CARE COMPANY, L.P. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm by Sheppard Mullin
There, plaintiffs brought a tying claim against American Express under Section One of the Sherman Act, alleging that defendant American Express unlawfully forced them to accept American Express credit cards and debit cards as a condition of accepting American Express charge cards. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
In Bendix Autolite Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
After learning that Miracle Star stopped accepting CalWORKs (California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids) recipients under the contract after December 2000, the auditor advised Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt that the contract was reimbursed on actual costs, and not on a fee-for-services rate. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]