Search for: "Creek Nation v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
This held that the Creek nation still has its original reservation in Oklahoma. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:08 pm
He flees to the United States, where he seeks asylum on the ground that he will be tortured if returned to Syria. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:09 am
” An 1833 Treaty fixed borders for a “permanent home to the whole Creek Nation of Indians,” and promised that the United States would “grant a patent, in fee simple, to the Creek nation of Indians for the [assigned] land” to continue “so long as they shall exist as a nation, and continue to occupy the country hereby assigned to them. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch, announced that the Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s reservation boundaries had never been disestablished. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:56 pm
Murphy was decided with a one-sentence per curiam opinion: "The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is affirmed for the reasons stated in McGirt v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:23 pm
The voting lineup in one of the Creek Nation companion cases is even more ambiguous. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Oklahoma, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a substantial portion of the state of Oklahoma—including most of the city of Tulsa—is an Indian reservation of the Creek Nation. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:53 am
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies) Dossett v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies)Dossett v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
”[9] The majority concluded its opinion by noting that the United States promised the Muscogee (Creek) Nation a reservation and has never withdrawn the reservation. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
”[9] The majority concluded its opinion by noting that the United States promised the Muscogee (Creek) Nation a reservation and has never withdrawn the reservation. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
The history of Indian Territory, Oklahoma statehood, and the Creek and other Native nations is, like much Native history in the United States, tangled; if you are interested, you can find an amicus brief that I joined that delves into that complexity here. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am
Jsutice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the standard for a state criminal subpoena should be the "demonstrated, specific need" test adopted by the Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:53 pm
Webinar Narrative: The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on May 11, 2020 in McGirt v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:24 pm
McGirt v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
