Search for: "Crews v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a commercial fisherman can be convicted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s “anti-shredding” provision for ordering his crew to throw seventy-two undersized fish overboard, dominated coverage of the Court. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, testing the sweep — or the narrowness — of a federal law that seeks to protect evidence of crime from being destroyed. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am by David Markus
United States, which asks the question: Was it the government that went overboard? [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm by Richard M. Re
United States, and it's a weird one. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
For instance, last summer Under Armour paid Will Ferrell and the crew at Funny or Die to produce a short video, “Tom’s Best Friend”, which featured Under Armour products worn by Patriot’s QB Tom Brady and in the background of the scene, but was more than anything a comedy sketch. [4] However, it was a comedy sketch that prominently displayed the sponsor’s brand of clothing. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:20 am by Jim Walker
Carnival Corporation et al., Case No. 2:12 CV 05517, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]