Search for: "Cross v. Allen" Results 61 - 80 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
In any event, the federal government sought review, and King filed a conditional cross-petition. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
John Allen, the president of the Brookings Institution and co-chair of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee for the Prevention of Targeted Violence Against Faith-Based Organizations; Paul Goldenberg, co-chair of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee for the Prevention of Targeted Violence Against Faith-Based Organizations; Eugene Kontorovich, a professor at Antonin Scalia Law School; and Clifford May, the president of the Foundation for the Defense of… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The speakers for the event include Hudson Senior Fellow Eric Brown, Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom Sam Brownback, Axios reporter Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian, Uyghur Human Rights Project Board Chair Nury Turkel and Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation Senior Fellow Adrian Zenz. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its opinion in the case of Allen Family Trust v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 12:56 am
Just this week, the UK Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Unwired Planet v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Julie Brown
For example, Oyez has a brief summary available for Allen v Cooper, a case that will be heard this term on November 5, 2019. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am by Caroline Shaw
The chapters will, in turn, foreground gender and the sexual slander of women; group defamation – or, the protection of individual v. community; and biography, reputation and the (post)imperial nation. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well settled that “[a] cause of action for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Elstein v Phillips Lytle, LLP, 108 AD3d 1073, 1073 [4th Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]), and that, “[w]hat is important [in determining the accrual date] is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]; see Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550,… [read post]