Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 21 - 40
of 23,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:09 am
Franssen (University of Liège - School of Law) has posted Cross-border Gathering of Electronic Evidence in the EU: Toward More Direct Cooperation under the e-Evidence Regulation (BERGSTRÖM, M., MITSILEGAS, V. and QUINTEL, T. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Yellowhammer Fund v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Certiorari was not granted in McClinton v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Paul v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm
Bissonnette v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
A visitor for business or pleasure is never employment authorized and would cross the line into unauthorized employment territory if they engaged in any kind of employment, i.e., by providing services or labor to a person or entity in the U.S. for wages or other remuneration. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
In Hess v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
P’ship v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
However, to paraphrase Justice Stephen Breyer, writing in Heffernan v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am
In addition, most of the cultural goods looted during World War II crossed multiple borders. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
" Doe v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am
The LMEG motion should be a poignant reminder that the projections utilized in the DCF calculation are at best fertile grounds for cross examination, and perhaps grounds for exclusion altogether. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
HR6090, which passed the House of Representatives Wednesday by a 320-91 vote, would provide, in relevant part, For purposes of this Act, the term "definition of antisemitism"— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance], of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the "[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism"… [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:26 am
The case is entitled Waxler v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONMatter of D. v Hart [read post]
