Search for: "Cross v. Evans"
Results 61 - 80
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2020, 7:12 am
–Cross v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
" White v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
If the parties litigate, the abuser may even cross-examine his spouse (a practice that is prohibited in some jurisdictions. i.e. the UK, and Australia). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Amparo v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court stayed decision in the case pending a decision by the Eleventh Circuit in Evans v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Defenses commonly arising in copyright litigation—License (2d ed.).Anand Vihar LLC v Evans Group Inc., 8:16-CV-841-T-27TBM, 2016 WL 9526560, at *2 [MD Fla July 6, 2016]Substantial Similarity of Literary WorksExpert testimony is far less critical in a case like this than it is in a case where specialized knowledge is required to dissect the objective components of the copyrighted work. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
Mei Ling v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:18 am
No discovery, no cross-examinations, nothing. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Merrill is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor at Columbia Law School. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
In Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
Evan Lee has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
To the extent that third-party plaintiffs’ submission of extrinsic evidence purporting to support a direct claim of legal malpractice could have been construed by the court as a request for leave to amend their third-party complaint, such a request was properly denied because third-party plaintiffs’ new claim is patently lacking in merit (see Broyles v Town of Evans, 147 AD3d 1496, 1497 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:15 pm
[v] Gerstmann, Evan. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Malpractice and Tort Law Marc Ginsberg, The John Marshall Law School (Chicago), Cross-Disciplinary Expert Testimony In Medical Negligence Litigation Mark Hall, Wake Forest University, The Restatement (Third) of Medical Liability Michelle Mello, Stanford University, Practice Changes Among Medical Malpractice "Frequent Flyers" Alix Rogers, Stanford Law School, Neither Property Nor Tort: The Curious Case of Quasi-Property of Human Bodily Remains D. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Obduskey v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:19 am
Evan Lee has this blog’s analysis of Wednesday’s opinion in the other case, Garza v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Hilliard v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:16 am
Plachta reported on the ECtHR decision in Krombach/Bamerski and the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision (Nait-Liman v. [read post]
