Search for: "Cross v. Quarterman"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
In Oliver v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: Oliver v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
Citing the Court's opinion earlier this Term in Burton v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 8:34 am
In the Panetti [v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Quarterman
• US v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Quarterman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Further, counsel for Provenzano shall have the opportunity to cross-examine Dr. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Further, counsel for Provenzano shall have the opportunity to cross-examine Dr. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Quarterman, No. 06-10872 Denial of a habeas corpus petition alleging that a trial judge was required to recuse himself is affirmed where the state appellate court's decision denying a new trial was not contrary to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, and therefore did not meet the structural error test requiring automatic reversal.. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
McBride, No. 06-7550 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed in part where petitioner was not denied the effective assistance of counsel, but vacated where the state circuit court contravened his Sixth Amendment confrontation right by applying a per se rule restricting cross-examination of the prosecution's expert under a rape shield law. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Quarterman, No. 06-20764 The prohibition against successive section 2254 petitions does not require a prisoner to challenge all judgments from a single court in a single habeas petition. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70004 Denial of an application for a certificate of appealability following denial of habeas relief is affirmed in part, but reversed in part where, in light of the recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Quarterman, No. 05-20350 Denial of federal habeas petition is reversed and remanded for a de novo hearing of appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, as the state habeas trial court's findings do not survive review where the appellate court did not specify which facts it accepted and which it rejected in denying the petition. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Quarterman, No. 03-20401 "Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital murder case is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) trial counsel provided ineffective representation; and 2) jury instructions given at the sentencing phase of his trial violated his constitutional rights pursuant to Penry v. [read post]
