Search for: "Cross v. Robinson" Results 161 - 180 of 290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court decision in Robinson v Shell Oil Co., wherein the court found that the term “employer” in Title VII encompassed former employers. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor(and related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:58 am by Joy Waltemath
” The court noted that in Robinson v Shell Oil Co, the Supreme Court construed “employees” as defined in Title VII to include both current and former employees because the definition lacked a “temporal qualifier. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:34 am
The Supreme Court of Canada last week, in Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:35 am by Samantha G. Wilson
Robinson recently considered a number of motions and cross-motions for summary judgment, a Daubert motion, and construed several claim terms. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 10:08 am by Robert Vrana
Judge Robinson then considered cross motions for summary judgment of infringement and noninfringement of two asserted claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Robinson, 293 Kan. 1002, 270 P.3d 1183 [ Kansas Supreme Court 2012], State v. [read post]