Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 16,528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am
InFederman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Asa result, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment andDENIES the Government’s motion to dismiss and alternative cross-motion forsummary judgment.I. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
In National Small Business United v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:10 pm
The trial (Liberty v SSHD) is expected to run for two days at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
As we talked, they pondered when their country had crossed the Rubicon? [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm
Court Decisions on Cross-Plan Offsetting In Peterson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
On February 20, 2024, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its opinion in Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 2:42 pm
A broad cross-ideological array of economists and land-use scholars have concluded that it is responsible for massive housing shortages in many parts of the United States, thereby cutting off millions of people – particularly the poor and minorities – from economic and social opportunities. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
No state, let alone the United States, engages in diplomatic relations with the cartels, nor do the cartels purport to maintain diplomatic relations. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:15 pm
§ 706(2)(C) (stating that courts must “set aside agency action” if found to be “in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right”). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
Freshub, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
However, in the case of Dong v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
The argument concerned four applications from industrial polluters and allied States (consolidated under Ohio v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Although when it crossed his mind Taft did indeed identify with Andrew Johnson and repudiate the radical Republicans who sought to limit executive power (which included his own father), he nevertheless possessed many reasons to support a strong executive apart from relitigating the racial battles of 1868. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Exclusionary zoning is permitted under Euclid v. [read post]
