Search for: "Cross v. The State of Texas et al" Results 1 - 20 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2009, 5:04 am
Each of these defendants filed a motion to cross-examine the State's experts listing eight areas of concern about the internal workings of the Intoxilyzer 5000. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that two sets of petitioners, hereinafter referred to as "Industry Petitioners" and "Environmental Petitioners," seek review of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) final rule partially approving and partially disapproving the most recent revision to Texas's State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) pursuant to the Clean… [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:55 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief in support of Texas from Babylon Bee et al Amicus briefs in support of NetChoice/CCIA preliminary injunction motion Chamber of Progress et al EFF RCFP et al TechFreedom Texas response. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:49 pm by Steven Cohen
M and N Eaves et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Texas – December 19, 2022) involves a car accident with a commercial vehicle. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:38 am by Steven Cohen
Daimler, AG et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Texas – September 25th, 2018) involves a products liability claim. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Steven Cohen
City of San Antonio et al – United States District Court – Western District of Texas – April 25th, 2022) involves a claim under section 1983 related to damages following the plaintiff’s arrest outside of her friend’s domicile in February 2019. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
DT Midstream Inc. et al. it was not as exclusive as the servitude owner wanted it to be. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 8:23 am by Steven Cohen
Hierholzer et al – United States District Court – Western District of Texas – December 28th, 2018) involves a claim that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to the serious medical needs of the plaintiff during his incarceration at Kerr County Detention Center. [read post]