Search for: "Cross v. U. S" Results 141 - 160 of 988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 5:00 am by Grayson Clary
As the dissent in Vergara emphasized, “[u]nlike physical contraband, electronic contraband is borderless and can be accessed and viewed in the United States without ever having crossed a physical border. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 2:07 pm by sandylaw
That means if you name is on the account directly or indirectly you will be in the cross-hairs and the ultimate target. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since the proposed claims in defendant’s third amended complaint are insufficient as a matter of law (Cross beat NY v Liirn, 169 AD3d 604 [1st Dept 2019]), the motion to amend the answer is denied. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Miho Suzuki v Greenberg 2023 NY Slip Op 31289(U) April 21, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159360/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Johnson v Watts 2023 NY Slip Op 32825(U) August 14, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 502133/2018 Judge: Peter P. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:11 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: $52,000 Illinois Jury Verdict in Motorcycle Rear-End Crash Motorcycle-Firefighter Killed After Being Cut Off by U-Turning Vehicle Cook County Jury Finds for Driver of Car in Motorcyclist’s Injury Case – Utterback v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 8:12 am
  A period of significant discovery precipitated cross-motions for summary judgment; the U District Court of Maryland denied Manufacturer’s motion in full and Insurer’s in part. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by scanner1
DOHRMAN, CHARLES CHRISTENSEN and YULIYA CHRISTENSEN; WALKER S. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Siegel v Melito & Adolfsen, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 31373(U) April 14, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152781/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly granted Nassau County's petition to vacate the arbitration award and properly denied the PBA's cross petition to confirm the award upon the court's finding that that the award was irrational and the arbitrator clearly exceeded a specifically enumerated limitation on his power. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, said the Appellate Division, Supreme Court properly granted Nassau County's petition to vacate the arbitration award and properly denied the PBA's cross petition to confirm the award upon the court's finding that that the award was irrational and the arbitrator clearly exceeded a specifically enumerated limitation on his power. [read post]