Search for: "Crow Indian Tribe v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 7:41 am
His concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
United States, however, recognized an exception for cases in which a nonmember enters a contract or other consensual commercial relationship with a tribe or its members. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:06 am
This line of cases can be traced back to 1978, when Justice Rehnquist held that Indian tribes gave up their authority to prosecute non-Indians when they submitted to the overriding sovereignty of the United States: This principle would have been obvious a century ago when most Indian tribes were characterized by a want of fixed laws [and] of competent tribunals of justice. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:30 pm
United States, in which the Supreme Court held that the Crow Tribe could not bar non-Indians from fishing on the Big Horn River, learned that Justice Byron White enjoyed fly fishing in Montana, including on the Big Horn River. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am
The petitioner in Herrera, a member of the Crow Tribe, contended that Wyoming’s admission to the Union did not extinguish the Tribe’s right to hunt on unoccupied lands within the state, a right previously guaranteed by treaty. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm
Wyoming, "Whether Wyoming's admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians' 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the 'unoccupied lands of the United States,' thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
Crow Tribe of Indians exhaustion requires a showing that the tribal court acted in bad faith, or whether it is sufficient to demonstrate that the Tribe’s governing council did so and that the Tribe’s judiciary lacked judicial independence. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
Herrera nor Indian law more broadly are out of the woods yet. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
Several Native American tribes still occupied most of the land, with some formal ownership recognized by treaty with the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 8:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
The justices will specifically determine “whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the ‘unoccupied lands of the United States,’ thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Wyoming (Jan. 8): Validity of 1868 treaty giving Crow Tribe of Indians the right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States” Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:55 pm
"75 But, again, what other option are we left with when the United States does not seem able to even admit its status as empire,76 much less reckon with it as a problem of constitutional order? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Crowe Deegan v. [read post]
