Search for: "Crowe v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
She ultimately used her private feelings of being "in-between" to publicly contend that identities are not fixed, an idea that has powered campaigns for equal rights in the United States for the past half-century. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:01 am
“That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death,” the Supreme Court said in its decision Monday. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Serena Mayeri
The Loving decision came at a pivotal moment in the history of race, gender, law, and marriage in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:39 am
For example, this op ed in the WSJ attempts to challenge the constitutionality of the legal tool that civil rights activists used to dismantle Jim Crow in public schools (via Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm by Joe Patrice
United States, concerning the treaty power. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 4:29 am by jonathanturley
President Biden has denounced pre-2020 and post-2020 changes to the state election laws as not just “Jim Crow on steroids” but “Jim Eagle,” an awkward effort to suggest something more scary than Jim Crow. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am by Guest Blogger
  In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 1:02 am
Ninth_Cir_Pasadena.jpeg In involuntary manslaughter trial, the Confrontation Clause did not bar the investigating officer's testimony as it was based "almost entirely upon his own observations and statements made to him at that time by" the defendant and the witness was cross-examined at trial "about what he had observed and what Crowe had told him," in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States (379 U.S. 241), decided on December 14, 1964, was a landmark case holding that the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]