Search for: "Cruise v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 9:35 am
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am
The mens rea for a lottery offence under s. 207.1 includes proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that: The accused was the owner, operator, or agent, of an international cruise ship; and The accused knowingly did not comply with all of the conditions required by s. 207.1 to conduct or operate a lottery scheme lawfully during a trip on the cruise ship; OR The accused was a person participating in a lottery scheme aboard an international cruise ship; and The accused knowingly… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
S. 1, 10 (1972); see also Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am
At the time, this was considered a direct application of the United States Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
Ed. 2d 513 (1972); Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:27 am
We have previously written about both the United States Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. and Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
So for that issue, absent anything new (like the Supreme Court stepping in and saying that its earlier dicta about the scope of state law in Viking River Cruises was correct), we pretty much know at this point how these things will go in both federal and state court.Judge Lee adds a concurrence that has little to do with the substance of the court's holding but that he nonetheless feels is important to add just so employers don't potentially get stuck with issue… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:56 pm
Facts: This case (Waters v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:14 am
Price v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 5:38 pm
Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
The cruise itself departed and returned to Sydney but included time outside of Australia, including in New Zealand. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 5:02 am
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 2014 WL 6682514 (S.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
A cruise goes wrong. [read post]
