Search for: "Cruz v New York City Hous. Auth."
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2009, 8:36 am
Under these circumstances, any purported failure on the part of Able to provide ACE with timely notice of the underlying claim did not excuse ACE's unreasonable delay in disclaiming coverage (see New York City Hous. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Work may be considered as ongoing during a short lapse of time necessary to conduct tests designed to assure proper performance where such testing is an essential element of the work by the insured (see Perez v New York City Hous. [read post]
