Search for: "Cruz v. Johnson*"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
The California Supreme Court expanded upon Broughton in Cruz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 1:45 pm
So that's $124,000 -- plus attorney fees on appeal -- down.Not only that, but Justice Johnson also makes fairly clear (without expressly holding) that had O'Melveny filed a cross-appeal of the haircut it took on fees, it almost certainly would have won, since it's impermissible to whack a fee request on the ground that you "knew going in" that it was probably a pro bono case. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:43 am
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Lynch v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:24 pm
To make three, you need not one, not two, but three.Read Justice Elia's complete opinion for more detail if you're unsure about the concept.Some of this advanced mathematics is moot at this point, since after the Court of Appeal issued its OSC, the Appellate Division of the Santa Cruz Superior Court got the message and stopped hearing appeals with two (instead of three) judges. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 11:38 am
Today's MetNews reports on Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:11 pm
Ted Cruz for Senate Concepcion v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 6:54 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: A Chew Toy for Dogs Provokes a Spirited Supreme Court Argument (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Republican Ted Cruz introduces bill to block US supreme court expansion (Martin Pengelly, The Guardian) How Ginsburg’s death and Kavanaugh’s maneuvering shaped the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:07 am
” See Cruz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm
” See Cruz v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:12 pm
Marsh, 481 U.S. 200, 211 (1987); Cruz v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:59 pm
Jason Cruz, No. 104,847 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; First-degree murder (premeditated)Shawn E. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
In Shehee v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The statute is broad in scope and is not limited to protection against the perpetration of sex crime offenses upon children but in fact extends "to other dangers as well" (id.; see also People v Cruz, 152 Misc 2d 436, 438-439 [1991]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Ted Cruz 5/16/22 R 596/1 29 5/02/22 20-1800 Shurtleff v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Ted Cruz 5/16/22 R 596/1 29 5/02/22 20-1800 Shurtleff v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
Brown, Kilgore v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
