Search for: "Cruz v. Office of Personnel Management"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
Cruz, the owner of Marik [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:35 am
Sylvia made the important connection between the case of Escola v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-6259, Solano-Cruz v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
EPA staffers and the Office of Management and Budget reportedly criticized EPA for not providing justification for the reduced standard. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s holding—granting qualified immunity to law-enforcement officers who stopped the petitioner from praying silently in her own home because there was no prior case law involving similar facts—conflicts with Hope v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Precythe 17-8151 Issues: (1) Whether a court evaluating an as-applied challenge to a state’s method of execution based on an inmate’s rare and severe medical condition should assume that medical personnel are competent to manage his condition and that procedure will go as intended; (2) whether evidence comparing a state’s method of execution with an alternative proposed by an inmate must be offered via a single witness, or whether a court at summary judgment… [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
In a published statement about the deployment, Germany’s Foreign Office stated, “Germany’s presence in the South China Sea underscores its continued commitment to freedom of navigation and the preservation of the rules-based international order in the Indo-Pacific, which is coming under pressure in the South China Sea. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
In a published statement about the deployment, Germany’s Foreign Office stated, “Germany’s presence in the South China Sea underscores its continued commitment to freedom of navigation and the preservation of the rules-based international order in the Indo-Pacific, which is coming under pressure in the South China Sea. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Rule 23(b) If they manage to satisfy all of the prerequisites of Rule 23(a), would-be class plaintiffs also must show that they satisfy at least one of the three 23(b) requirements. [read post]
