Search for: "Cruz v. People" Results 181 - 200 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
  But it is a choice the people of Alabama have made, and nothing [in] the Constitution of the United States forbids it. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
But some people are more difficult to find than others. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 2:38 am by SHG
In sum, the plaintiffs version of the events was "manifestly untrue, physically impossible, or contrary to common experience, and such testimony should be disregarded as being without evidentiary value" (Cruz v New York City Tr. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:05 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
From the Santa Cruz (CA) Sentinel, this report: Monning researching bill to address rent control lawsuits. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Joey Fishkin
 Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Even the Supreme Court prefers to treat Bush v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:05 am by Jim Gerl
  In a later installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am by Ben
A few weeks ago KickassTorrents warned its users against phishing attempts, in which malicious parties attempt to obtain the personal details of users.On June 11, 2015, the Advocate-General Pedro Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion in HP Belgium v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
 The ECtHR ruled that the Lithuanian authorities had failed to strike “a fair balance between, on the one hand, the protection of public morals and the rights of religious people, and, on the other [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am by Ellena Erskine
He wrote that the case should at least be held pending the court’s decision in Cruz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-6259, Solano-Cruz v. [read post]