Search for: "Cundiff v. State"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2009, 8:47 am
Supreme Court decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:20 pm
In Mickey Cundiff v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:57 am
The Court of Appeals just published Miller v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:02 pm
” Cundiff v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 7:56 pm
Verizon argued that it got to keep the uncashed checks and plaintiffs wanted them to go to charity, but my sense was instead that they remained -- or at least should remain -- the property of the individuals to whom these checks were sent, and that the property should thus revert to the state under the unclaimed property laws and remain there until the relevant individual requests them (which they can do forever, and the Controller is under a statutory duty to find and notify them). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:02 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:52 am
” See Whyte v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
Cundiff v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Our moderator was the great Vicki Cundiff of Paul Hastings. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Kolon case, TianRui Group v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:00 am
(Cundiff v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:36 pm
He acknowledged that various member states provided for procedural mechanisms to collect evidence (e.g: the saisie contrefaçon, UK disclosure). [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Overview Today, landowners in the state have the right to drain their land with the natural flow of water and discharge excess water into natural watercourses. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
