Search for: "Cunningham v. Hamilton County"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2020, 4:44 am
Hamilton County Municipal Court Judge Ted Berry agreed and erroneously permitted the State to use an additional peremptory challenge to excuse one of the jurors. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
Judge Penny Cunningham dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissent in the appellate decision in State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:56 am
In November of 2015, Buttery was indicted for failing to register with the Hamilton County Sheriff’s office in violation of R.C. 2950.04. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:48 am
American Trading informally reported to the Hamilton County Sheriff’s department, not its local police chief. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Pat Foley agreed and granted his motion. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:35 am
Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Pat Foley agreed and granted his motion. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
Case Background In 1994, seventeen-year-old Anthony Carnes got into a fight with another teenager in Hamilton County. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Robert C. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160) bikini (18)… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Harris County Bail Bond Bd., No. 05-20714 A decision finding that a Texas statute restricting solicitation of potential customers denied bail bondsmen their First Amendment rights is affirmed in part and reversed in part where all but one of the restrictions violated the bondsmen's right to commercial speech. [read post]
