Search for: "Curt Bradley"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2008, 3:43 am
Bellia, Curt Bradley, Henry Monaghan, and Trevor Morrison, as well as Sarah Cleveland, who was invited to speak for the "international law" crowd. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
” Comments are by Curt Bradley (Duke) and Maggie Gardner (Harvard Fellow). 1:00 – 2:15 Session 3: Ronald Brand (Pitt), “Understanding Judgments Recognition. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 12:43 pm
Here is Curt Bradley’s summary of the facts and legal issues in the case, here is Samantha Goldstein’s summary of the D.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 4:01 am
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee comprised of Professors Curt Bradley (University of Chicago), Maggie Gardner (Cornell), Leah Litman (Michigan), Joanna Schwartz (UCLA), and Diego Zambrano (Stanford), with the result announced at the Federal Courts section program at the 2022 AALS Annual Meeting. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 4:01 am
Nominations will be reviewed by a prize committee comprised of Professors Curt Bradley (University of Chicago), Maggie Gardner (Cornell), Leah Litman (Michigan), Joanna Schwartz (UCLA), and Diego Zambrano (Stanford), with the result announced at the Federal Courts section program at the 2022 AALS Annual Meeting. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:00 pm
(The earlier version was the one that Curt Bradley and I discussed here in the NYT a few weeks ago, and that Lawfare mistakenly analyzed yesterday after the new JAFTA’s passage in a post we have now removed). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:37 am
In a new paper, my colleague Curt Bradley and I discuss a much earlier debate between Olson and Roberts—while both were working in the Reagan Justice Department—in which their positions were essentially reversed. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:42 pm
Although Curt Bradley’s post magnanimously notes that his position lost 9-0 in Samantar, it would be wrong to see the decision as a defeat for Curt and his co-author Jack Goldsmith. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:43 am
Steve and Curt Bradley differed starkly on the answer to question 1. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 3:06 am
An article that I wrote with Curt Bradley, which examined AUMFs throughout American history, provides a framework for understanding AUMFs. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:32 am
Holland (many citations here to Curt Bradley, David Golove, and other lawprofs), Judge Jordan’s majority opinion concludes: Whatever the Treaty Power? [read post]
1 May 2011, 9:24 am
The project director is my colleague, Curt Bradley. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
” Curt Bradley and Matt Waxman, while not expressly endorsing Marty’s third way, traced its genesis to the course of dealing between Congress and the executive that has evolved since the Framing. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:35 am
In a new article, my Duke colleague Curt Bradley and I explain the originalist turn to practice, describe the historical gloss approach, compare gloss with both the narrow and broader accounts of Madisonian liquidation respectively developed by Caleb Nelson and Baude, and suggest that the differences between gloss and liquidation concerning the proper role of historical practice in constitutional interpretation render liquidation less normatively attractive and… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 1:42 pm
My colleague Curt Bradley and I have recently taken a detailed look at the constitutional debate over Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1937 proposal to pack the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Curt Bradley and Niel Siegel already have a critique up on SSRN. [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:29 am
As Curt Bradley and I recently explained, a political commitment “imposes no obligation under international law,” a nation “incurs no state responsibility for its violation,” and thus “a successor President is not bound by a previous President’s political commitment under either domestic or international law and can thus legally disregard it at will. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:18 pm
One can of course read a WMD-nexus into the clause, as Ackerman and Hathaway do, but this approach seems inconsistent with a tradition of interpreting AUMFs generously rather than strictly in light of the executive branch’s claims of Article II authority in the military and foreign affairs realms, as described by Jack and Curt Bradley here. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:45 am
Jack Goldsmith, More on the UN Charter, Syria, and “Illegal but Legitimate” Ken Anderson, Five Fundamental International Law Approaches to the Legality of a Syria Intervention Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman on the President’s Syria Press Conference, and a Brief Response Jack Goldsmith, Two Important Implications from President’s Press Conference in Sweden Lauren Bateman, Recent Presidential Remarks on Syria Raffaela Wakeman, SFRC Approves Syria Authorization Language Jack… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:18 pm
One can of course read a WMD-nexus into the clause, as Ackerman and Hathaway do, but this approach seems inconsistent with a tradition of interpreting AUMFs generously rather than strictly in light of the executive branch’s claims of Article II authority in the military and foreign affairs realms, as described by Jack and Curt Bradley here. [read post]
