Search for: "Curtin v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J heard an application to commit in the case of MBR Acres v Curtin. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
On 10 November 2022 there was a hearing in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Curtin. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
CNN stated that it was unlikely to pay for all its employees verification costs and author Stephen King voiced that he would leave Twitter if the plan goes ahead. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
Finally, in concluding his analysis of the constitutionality of the relevant chapter of the Act, MacMenamin J referred to Demir v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Curtin: note that the capacity to marry is lower threshold. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Perry intercalates abundant (and delightful) quotations from 18th century cases with his own discussion as he makes valuable points concerning the current debate on copyright rationale and scope.Part V “The lore of courts”Shubha Ghosh, in Chapter 10, “‘If Music Did Not Pay’: The State Court Roots of Justice Holmes’ Intellectual Property Jurisprudence”, considers IP decisions by Justice Holmes, when he was still serving on the Massachusetts… [read post]
 The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) leads a group of plaintiffs seeking to overturn Prop.22 in Castellanos v State of California (12 January 2021). [read post]
The intermingling of Industry 3.0 and 4.0 represents the state of matters in the current period of digitalisation of work. [read post]
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
Article IV also clearly states that such decisions are to be taken by the Ministerial Council in accordance with the specific requirements for “decision-making” in the WTO Agreement, or in any of the covered multilateral trade agreements. [read post]
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]