Search for: "Curtin v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2012, 9:31 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Curtin, 2013 U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
The analysis was prepared by my colleagues, Doug Christensen, Zeb Curtin and Courtney DaCosta. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Further, contrary to the petitioners' contention, the law does not limit the application of a lack of marketability discount to the goodwill of a corporation in all instances (see Matter of Brooklyn Home Dialysis Training Ctr., 293 AD2d 747; Hall v King, 265 AD2d 244, 245; Lehman v Piontkowski, 203 AD2d 257, 259; Matter of Raskin v Walter Karl, Inc., 129 AD2d 642, 644; Matter of Joy Wholesale Sundries, 125 AD2d 310; Matter of Fleischer, 107 AD2d 97; Matter of Blake… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
Lopez, Tax Rulings and State Aid: Now or Never, in Guest State aid blog, 27.11.2014, accessible at: https://www.lexxion.eu/en/stateaidpost/tax-rulings-and-state-aid-now-or-never/. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
Because “[t]he link between fantasy and intent is too tenuous for fantasy [alone] to be probative,” United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
They are very much part of the geographical territory of a sovereign State. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
Curtin 22 Cal. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:48 pm
” Curtin then orders a Coke. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
Gabriel Moens, Professor of Law, Curtin Law School, Australia - Improving Public Health through Behavioural Rules: A Legitimate Legislative Project of a Nany State or a Nudge State?! [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
Gabriel Moens, Professor of Law, Curtin Law School, Australia - Improving Public Health through Behavioural Rules: A Legitimate Legislative Project of a Nany State or a Nudge State?! [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Plaintiff also alleges sufficiently that Curtin mishandled the Gallegos in-house complaint and failed to apprise her of Gallegos's early settlement demand in the amount of $50,000 (see Boglia v Greenberg, 63 AD3d 973, 975 [2009]). [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Hill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 pm
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:32 pm
Trades Council of Cal., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:06 am
Ilarion TomarovThe Ukrainian Supreme Court in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Aurobindo Pharma Limited has recently introduce a bold approach to applying interim injunctions in disputes between originators and generics over the registration of patented pharmaceuticals. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:40 am
"A waiver of the attorney-client privilege may be found where the client places the subject matter of the privileged communication in issue or where invasion of the privilege is required to determine the validity of the client's claim or defense and application of the privilege would deprive the adversary of vital information (see Hurrell-Harring v State of New York, 75 AD3d 667, 668; 601 Realty Corp. v Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., 74… [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Curtin, 631 F.3d 380, 383 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 681) (alteration in original). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
