Search for: "Curtis v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 816
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
Curtis Pub. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 7:03 am
A&E Television Networks, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Kolb (Jason) v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
Law Offs. of Curtis V. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
But Art.1 states only Congress can borrow. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
On April 19, the Supreme Court delivered a decision in Türkiye Halk Bankasi S.A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
At the state level, there have been multiple bills introduced with the aim of regulating AI. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from professors Curtis J. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Lund, Discrimination, Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 11:47 pm
But in Biden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:16 pm
See also Dred Scott v. [read post]
